SonarQube

Avantages

SonarQube est complet. Il permet l'analyse de nombreux langages de développement sur plusieurs projets. Il propose de base plusieurs jeux de règles de qualité à appliquer et permet d'en ajouter d'autre. Pour chaque règle un exemple est fourni et des explications assez claire. Certaines règles concernent la qualité du code, mais pas que. Certaines touchent à la sécurité et d'autres aux performances. L'intégration dans un process de build via des tâches ou des jobs est assez facile.

Inconvénients

Le plus gros inconvénient de SonarQube est son coût qui peut s'avérer, selon les projets, un peu élevé. L'outil est néanmoins très facile à utiliser et à mettre en place.

Avantages

Le fait que l'on puis enregistrer nos propre metriques pour les tests de qualités

Inconvénients

La documentation n'est pas forcément la plus aisée

Avantages

il s'intègre dans le pipeline de compilation

Inconvénients

L'analyse du code prend du temps et parfois, il y a des recommandations qu'on ne peut pas corriger

Avantages

What I find most useful in this software is the code analysis, which gives detailed reports of the errors found and then suggests possible solutions. This saves time in software development.In addition, their large community helps solve problems that arise along the way.

Inconvénients

Sometimes the reports can give false positives, which requires that the personnel in charge of handling the software carefully review the results to avoid false positives.

Avantages

One of the outstanding values about SonarQube is the speed of analysis. It makes it easy to collaborate with other features to generate clean codes. I and my team had an easy time during deployment. It was quite easy to relate with our needs. Combining all this benefits leads to a consistent and reliable coding behavior.

Inconvénients

Installation of the tool was troublesome. We were forced to buy a new device with higher processing speed to avoid the numerous rebooting. Later, deployment and use was smooth.

Avantages

There is nothing about this company that I would ever recommend.

Inconvénients

Of all the terrible things about this service and company, it's their customer support that takes the cake!

Avantages

For a while, I used the SonarQube product demo which is great and interactive giving the best experience. The dashboard is easy to use since it is designed with a lot of clarity and motivation. While in use, SonarQube can detect and help remove secrets in code but at the same time offering security against any breaches. Dealing with security vulnerabilities in codes is now made possible. Lastly, there are clear security reports in PDF form which helps us to evaluate the risks on our systems.

Inconvénients

It meets our quality and security expectations. No setbacks.

Avantages

- It supports almost all commonly used languages like JAVA, Python, Javascript, etc.
- Integrates well with CI/CD pipeline established in tools like Jenkins and GitHub.
- Detects code duplication, bugs and vulnerabilities in code.

Inconvénients

- May be complex to understand the reports for new users.
- May block delivery/deployment if hard gates are enabled by DevOps team which may delay project delivery.

Avantages

The main feature of SonarQube is that it detects code complexities within the code so that the developer can optimize it. It also detects accessibility and security issues; code smells and suggests changes.

Inconvénients

It is a bit difficult to integrate with existing services and the quality checks may also conflict with other integrations.

Avantages

Easy to use interface
Rules flexibility
Broad set of rules to activate

Inconvénients

No roadmap for dynamic analysis
Reports API not so flexible
Fixed price approach

Avantages

I love SonarQube's real-time code analysis, providing instant feedback. Recently, while working on a project, it flagged potential code smells, helping me enhance code quality preemptively.

Inconvénients

It is sometimes overwhelming amount of information and alerts, which can make it challenging to prioritize and address issues effectively.

Avantages

SonarQube provides important metrics such as code smells, bugs, vulnerabilities, and code coverage. Easy integration with CI/CD tools.

Inconvénients

SonarQube may produce false positives, as with any static analysis tool.

Avantages

Report both security and code quality vulnerabilities, indicating the reason for the flaw and the possible resolution. It allows you to set thresholds so as not to compromise too much the quality of the code and the coverage of the tests.

Inconvénients

It is necessary to configure it to avoid false positives in terms of code quality that can block the release of the code.

Avantages

Envió de campañas de phising a usuarios de la empresa para reforzar ciberseguridad de las empresas

Inconvénients

la configuración inicial es complicada y la gestión de seguridad envió de correos, hay pocos ejemplos practicos o estan fuera de actualizacion

Avantages

Me gusta mucho la integración con el servicio de devops de azure, gracias a ello puedo integrar las tareas de revisión de código de SonartiQube en la integración continua. Los reportes que genera son de gran utilidad para detectar malas prácticas o brechas de seguridad en el código.

Inconvénients

Me gustaría que el panel de administración de la herramienta fuera más configurable, para poder hacer que el análisis de código sea más efectivo.

Avantages

This product has actually improved productivity within my team by making sure there’s no duplicate code and by making code easily understandable.

Inconvénients

Code maintenance is actually a difficult part.

Avantages

Easy-to-administer tool, with good functionality to monitor security part of your code (using SAST methodology), with ability to integrate with Jenkins, GitHub and other tools. You are able to fail the build if the code doesn't meet percentage score.

Inconvénients

When new repository is added - there should be pop-up suggestion to create SonarQube project for it, coming from SonarQube. At the moment the user/administrator must watch out for new repositories in the organisation, without a note from the system itself that there is a new repository which you might want to add for scanning.

Avantages

I love its ability to provide a clear and concise view of code quality.

Inconvénients

At first, I found it a bit overwhelming to understand all the available features and settings. Although the documentation and support help, I think there could be a better guide for new users.

Avantages

Comprehensive code quality analysis. Really good to detect bugs, vulnerabilities and code smells. And integration with popular CI/CD pipelines is really impressive.

Inconvénients

Setup and configuration can be complex for begineers. And limited support for some programming languages is what could be improved.

Avantages

- integrate CI/CD- customizable Quality Profiles- easy to use

Inconvénients

- performance Impact- limited programming language- open-source, some advanced features are only available in the commercial version

Avantages

Sonarqube helps me find out if there are any repetitive lines in my code. Since the code sometimes get lengthy or at times missed by me to recheck. It is added in continuous integration in jenkins which when runs code smells, coverage and quality will be detected.

Inconvénients

At times we need to precisely set all the settings for the issues to be detected. If any small mistake happens then no result can be seen. We use traditional sonarqube where we install and integrate rather then plugin in jenkins. So the traditional method needs to be more careful in installing and running it.

Avantages

The ability to analyze the quality of the code in each deployment or integration, together with the possibility of modifying the rules to allow deployment or not (quantity or criticality of errors or defects), as well as vulnerability analysis allows for better software, always keeping in mind of the developers the quality and security of the code.

Inconvénients

Like everything, the time it takes to leave it well configured and integrated with the rest of the systems, as well as the maintenance and updating of the standards, rules and vulnerabilities depending on the programming language and the news that are published at the level of security.

Avantages

This is very good and user friendly application.

Inconvénients

As such i didn't found any con for this application.

Avantages

It is simple for developers to recognize their code smells, unused lines of code, errors, problems with the third-party libraries they are using, etc. information and the precise location of the issue. It also offers answers to those problems. As a result, figuring out the problems and fixing them is simple. This will be a terrific tool for developers. Except that, we can introduce our own rules for checking the code quality. It could identify the code issues that are vulnerable to cyber attacks such as XSS, SQL Injection, etc.

Inconvénients

It was difficult to use the SonarQube on-premise application. Once we pushed a new code section, the server needed to restart in order for the application to work.

Alternatives envisagées 

Pourquoi passer à SonarQube

Avantages

Easily add source code analysis for potential bugs and pitfalls to warrant against developers' errors or just not efficient coding by novices, projects dependencies on vulnerable platforms and potential long-term support issues due to how your code is structured. Simple deployment of binaries needed for scans for major target build environments OSes, plus easy to use APIs, all for the benefit of easy integration into CI/CD pipelines.

Inconvénients

Caps and limits on key server instance component required when obtaining config for project and preset rules, when sending analysis results or getting quality gate results may make the pipelines seem to fail without easier discerning real reasons.